Tag Archive: Fan Fervor

Richard Armitage Fan Fervor: A Modest Theory of Idealism and Relativity

This post is part of an ongoing series which attempts to decipher fan fervor for Richard Armitage.

I couldn’t decide where to focus the central crux of this post, it feels like there are separate yet associated ideas which are still percolating in my head and thus remain somewhat blurred. As such this is probably a piece of premature posticulation on my part, but if you’ve been reading this blog for some time you should be used to this by now!

Richard Armitage

The first idea I want to muse on is that of the male ideal. I couldn’t help but let out a little chuckle recently when I read a random fangirl’s tweet “Richard Armitage has ruined all men for me. ALL!”. I had a similar feeling after seeing one of the most amazing live bands on the planet. All future gigs had an impossible standard to live up to; it took a little time to adjust to seeing the slew of average yet adequate local bands again. I can relate somewhat in relation to men, too. I sometimes wonder if my falling head over heels in love at a young age was such a good thing. Although the relationship in question ended at my instigation, the bar was set pretty damn high and I’ve probably been a bit too picky ever since.

While I hope that the fan who lamented “Richard Armitage had ruined all men” for her, made that statement in jest (as we can’t really “know” Richard Armitage), it does speak to the holistic nature of his appeal that has become part of the fan fervor dynamic. One of the first things I think fans want to find out upon forming some sort of admiration for someone based their talent and/or physical appeal is – are they are good person? Is this person worthy of my support and admiration beyond what is immediate; are they a person I can respect? Many feminists on the left have been confronted with this question in respect to Julian Assange and WikiLeaks. They admire the philosophy of the man and his organisation but are not so keen on his questionable sexual ethics, which really puts a dampener on the whole thing.

The Hidden Role of Fantasy in the Lucas/John Aftermath

This was supposed to be a brief post, it ended up being over 2000 words. Sorry! This will probably only be of interest to active online Richard Armitage fans, most of whom I am at odds with over the Lucas/John story line in Spooks. Here I hold myself up for slaughter once again.

Today I’m going to way in once more on the tricky subject of Richard Armitage fan fervor that I’ve been blogging about periodically since starting this blog over 12 months ago. There is something that has been on my mind since the intensely hostile and borderline hysterical anti-Spooks writer sentiment that some RA fans were venting following the demise of Lucas North in series nine of Spooks (I anticipate getting into trouble for using the words ‘borderline hysterical’. I’m not saying that everyone who didn’t like the story was hysterical but SOME certainly erred close, so I stand by it!). I’ve chosen not to mention my thoughts on the blog until now because I suspected it would be an unwelcome observation. But now I feel that perhaps the time is right to bring it up.

The Assange Army? Fangirling of a Different Kind


So much for taking a break from expositions of fan fervor, this one I could not resist taking a tilt at, having succumb to a mild dose of it myself (although it has now passed). Given the history of discussions on this blog concerning the fan fervor surrounding Richard Armitage who plays Lucas North in Spooks, I thought you guys might be interested in a new example of fangirling to have emerged in recent times. Julian Assange, the founder and face of the whistle blower website Wikileaks, is beginning to develop a keen following amongst what I assume to be left leaning women. For those who support the philosophy and actions of Wikileaks, Julian Assange is admired, not only for his intelligence, deep convictions and dedication to human rights and social justice, but also for, how shall I say, his aesthetic qualities….

Whenever I look at his ears in these close up pictures, I start to think how I would love to kiss and tongue them for hours… [source]

I was wondering if anyone else out there sins when they look at Julian’s lips?
The man has a sexy mouth. Oh no. I am sinning again.
[source]

He makes me blush like a schoolgirl. I think I have a crush on this guy. [source]

(I can see a new website being launched in the not too distant future.. WikiCrush.org). If you are not convinced that ‘fangirling’ of this international man of mystery could in any way resemble the perplexing feelings of fan fervor often expressed by admirers of Richard Armitage, check out this comment below:

Richard Armitage and the Character of Desire

It’s been a while since I’ve weighed in on the mad cap mayhem that is Richard Armitage fan fervor. As long-term readers of this blog will know, it’s somewhat of a fascination of mine. Why does this man attract such enthusiastic supporters? Is it the roles? The looks? The talent? RA is not the only handsome, talented actor out there to have scored a succession of wonderful roles – why all the fuss? In the past I’ve mused on the possible awakening of desire in RA’s female fans, lately it’s occurred to me that there is another aspect of the desire equation that needs pointing out. In fact it’s the precursor that makes the “awakening of desire” possible, and may go some way to answering the question that Servetus rightly pointed out was largely unanswered in my previous post: “Why does *Richard Armitage in particular* provoke this reaction of potentiating women’s acknowledgment of their inner passion?”

“God I’ve missed you..” Lucas North watches his ex-wife, Elisavieta Starkova, walk away in 7.4

When I began composing this piece it was not my initial intention to answer the “Why Richard?” question, but as it has transpired it seems that this is precisely what I’ve attempted to do, albeit in a half baked fashion! So here it goes. To my mind, there is clear common ground in three (possibly four) of RA’s most popular roles; John Thornton, Guy of Gisborne, and Lucas North (I note that John Porter is also popular, but as his appearance occurred well after the establishment of the fervorish RA fan base, he is excluded from the discussion for this reason). No, it’s not their broodiness (although one could argue it’s a recurring theme), it is their intense desire for one woman. Thornton for Margret, Guy for Marian, and Lucas for Elisavieta (I have not seen all of the productions that RA has appeared in, so I can’t address this subject in relation to some of his older roles). The deep longing that each character has, I suspect, is not only what poured fuel on the fan fervor flame to begin with (in North and South) but is also what has kept it burning. Desire has not only been a strong element in each of these characters, it has also been central to the stories in which they appear. Even Harry Kennedy, who RA played in the Vicar of Dibley, could be placed in this category as well. And needless to say, romantic desire is something that Richard Armitage portrays incredibly well. Is this what lies at the heart of RA fan fervor?

Why would this shared element among these roles be important? Well, some say (including sexologists and sex therapists), that what women want more than anything else in this world, is to be desired (incidentally I find the question of “what women want” somewhat absurd as we are not one homogeneous group who all want and think the same things.. but perhaps there are some things that rise above our diversity and are common between us in certain cultural contexts). I must clarify that being desired by a man is not necessarily the same as being loved by him. One can love another person without an intense desire for them, and conversely, one can desire someone without loving them (Did Guy really love Marian? I think that can be debated but his desire for her is indisputable). RA has embodied a number of characters who desire one woman in the way that many women would like to be desired themselves (OK, so perhaps that statement might be a bit dubious in relation to Guy of Gisborne, but taking into consideration the amount of Guy fan fic out there, perhaps it’s not!).

Before proceeding further I want to take a moment to define desire in the context of this discussion. Pi asked in response to the previous post on this subject – What kind of desire are we talking about here? While in that post I was addressing the ill-defined desire within a fan, here I am talking about the desire depicted on screen by the characters RA has played (which is connected to the fan’s desire by its resonance with her). Again, it is ill-defined, but a few adjectives will at least narrow the parameters a bit. Desire for another person is not the kind of narcissistic sexual desire of a character like Lee in Coldfeet. It’s a strong, deep and enduring longing. A craving, a yearning, a lust – that is singular, palpable, and earnest. The earnestness of the desire is probably what is most important here. If you’ve ever felt the desire of a man who is not earnest in his longing of you, you can dismiss him without a second thought. A man who is earnest in his desire of you on the other hand, if you don’t feel the same in return, it’s quite a tricky situation to contend with. Been there, done that? Then perhaps you can appreciate the fuzzy definition of desire that I’m working with here (which doesn’t particularly define what the desirer is desiring).


John Thornton is unable to hide his distress and face Mr. Bell upon mention of his unrequited love, Margret Hale.

The inclusion of Lucas North in the company of Thornton and Gisborne might not be clear to some, so let me explain. Without giving away too much of what is transpiring in series nine of Spooks (please refrain from S9 spoilers in your comments!), taking into consideration the personal story lines related to Lucas North in series seven, eight and nine, what is emerging for me about this character is that he loves deeply. In season seven he longed for his ex-wife Elisavieta. Even though they were divorced before his capture by the FSB, he claims to have thought of nothing but her during his eight year long incarceration. In series eight with Sarah Caulfield (I realise she is enemy number one among many RA fans, but I won’t be joining the chorus of condemnation of her here), even after Lucas learns that she is part of Nightingale, his strong feelings for her remain. He is conflicted, obviously, but is also grief stricken when she dies. In season 9 we learn of a love that has endured over 15 years, a love that he “can’t stay away” from.

Lucas North gently caresses his laptop monitor upon seeing the MI-5 file on his long lost and enduring love, Maya Lahan.

It’s one thing for these characters to want, desire and love a woman on paper, but it’s how this important aspect of these characters is brought to life by Richard Armitage on screen that matters most here. I’m not about to mount an exposition of his performances to provide evidence of his talent in this area – I’ll leave that to others who are more skilled at that kind of analysis than I. In short, however, its the earnestness that RA illuminates in his performance of his characters’ love and desire that I think his fans, in particular, are responding to. If “what a woman most wants” is to be intensely desired (sexually, physically, and emotionally) by a man who feels a longing for her, and only her, it’s not such a stretch to suggest that what they also want, (apparently!), is to watch a man who portrays this exquisitely on screen.

Is this the essence of the Armitage Army’s unparalleled enthusiasm? Is their interest in him driven by his embodiment of the desirer and their desire to be desired? One can’t be 100% sure, and one can’t assume that all his fans/supporters enjoy his work for the same reason, but still, given the common characteristic of desire in all of RA’s most popular roles, I can’t help but suspect that my proposition is not too far from the mark.

Ponder, squee and discuss…

Screencaps from Richard Armitage Net and the Spooks Fan Blog Gallery.

Slaves to the Fervor? – Consuming RA Strike Back Press

This post is a short note that adds to my ongoing series of inadvertent Richard Armitage fan fervor observations. There’s been a frenzy of activity among RA addicts these past couple of weeks as press reports and interviews with RA for Strike Back have flooded the internet (the term ‘waterfall’ comes to mind!).

While cruising the blogosphere of late I couldn’t help but get the sense that some fans were discovering that there can indeed be too much of a good thing. The initial excitement that some may of had for the new flurry of RA information eventually turned into – dare I say, resentment? Not necessarily towards the media onslaught, but rather towards ones own need to consume it all? My instincts tell me that some fans are feeling a vague sense of having become slaves to their RA fandom. And with this sense is an attendant recognition that while fan fervor is fun, slavish fan fervor on the other hand is not such a pleasant feeling. Consequently, for some, this recognition may have provided an opportunity to pause and reflect. Offering a wake up call, of sorts.

The observation I’ve relayed here is based on nothing more than my superficial appraisal, so this is why it is brief. Thus it is more of a question than a statement. Do you get the sense that some fans have felt a little slavish to their RA fandom of late? Did you get caught up in the frenzy? Did you come to resent or be concerned by it somewhat? What are your impressions and thoughts?

Strike Back image from Richard Armitage Online

A Friendly Reminder

To those Richard Armitage fans who are currently being whipped up into a Strike Back frenzy, I don’t mean to be a party pooper, but I feel obliged to remind everyone of their obligations under the RA Fan Fervor Heat Emissions Reductions Scheme. Please refer to the previous post on this issue for more information. Thank you.

RED FLASH! Don’t forget! The Friday Photo Caption Contest closes on Thursday night. So it’s your last chance to get an entry in. Two entries per person, max. The winner will be announced in the next Friday Photo post. Good luck everybody, it seems I have a tough decision ahead!